Federal drug laws develop a labeling issue. When you hear the term "drug trafficker," you may think of Pablo Escobar or Walter White, but the reality is that under federal law, drug traffickers consist of individuals who buy pseudo-ephedrine for their methamphetamine dealer; function as middleman in a series of small deals; or even get a luggage for the wrong good friend. Thanks to conspiracy laws, everyone on the totem pole can be subject to the very same serious mandatory minimum sentences.
To the men and females who drafted our federal drug laws in 1986, this may come as a surprise. According to Sen. Robert Byrd, cosponsor of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, the factor to attach 5- and ten-year obligatory sentences to drug trafficking was to penalize "the kingpins-- the masterminds who are truly running these operations", and the mid-level dealers.
Fast forward twenty-five years. Today, nearly everyone convicted of a federal drug criminal activity is convicted of "drug trafficking", which usually leads to at least a 5- or ten-year obligatory jail sentence. That's a great deal of time in federal prison for many individuals who are minor parts of drug trade, the vast bulk of whom are men and women of color.
This is the system that federal district Judge Mark Bennett sees every day. Judge Bennett sits on the district court in northern Iowa, and he manages a lot of drug cases., I would have sent out 1,092 of my fellow citizens to federal jail for mandatory minimum sentences varying from sixty months to life without the possibility of release.
The numbers can't convey the unreasonable disaster of all of it. This is how he describes a current drug trafficking case:
I recently sentenced a group of more than twenty defendants on meth trafficking conspiracy charges. All of them plead guilty. Eighteen were 'tablet smurfers,' as federal prosecutors put it, indicating their role totaled up to regularly purchasing and delivering cold medication to meth cookers in exchange for very little, low-grade quantities to feed their extreme addictions. A lot of were unemployed or underemployed. Numerous were single mothers. They did not offer or directly disperse meth; there were no hoards of money, guns or counter surveillance devices. Yet all of them faced necessary minimum sentences of sixty or 120 months.
There is data to recommend that Judge Bennett's experience is not uncharacteristic. In 2007, the U.S. Sentencing Commission assembled substantial data on drug and fracture sentencing. They found that in 2005, the majority of the lowest-level drug- and crack-trafficking defendants-- males and females described as "street-level dealerships", "couriers/mules", and "renter/loader/lookout/ enabler/users"-- got five- or ten-year obligatory jail sentences. This is specifically true for crack-cocaine accused, the majority of whom are black; regardless of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, selling a small quantity of crack drug (28 grams) brings the very same mandatory minimum sentence-- five years-- as offering 500 grams of powder drug.
This is the truth for which proponents of severe federal drug laws should account. We can not pretend that heavy sentences for ladies like Kemba Smith and males like Jamel Dossie are the fluke errors of overboard laws. We must admit that our sentencing of minor participants in the drug trade to prison terms suggested for the leaders www.criminallawyerslasvegas.com/drug-conspiracy-defense-las-vegas/ of large drug organizations-- as a common incident, not as an exception. As a result, we unnecessarily send to prison lots of minor culprits for extended periods. Judge Bennett decries the human expenses of these sentences:
If lengthy necessary minimum sentences for nonviolent druggie in fact worked, one might be able to rationalize them. But there is no evidence that they do. I have actually seen how they leave numerous countless young kids parent-less and thousands of aging, infirm and dying parents childless. They ruin families and strongly sustain the cycle of hardship and dependency.
Here, again, we have proof that Judge Bennett is best: long necessary sentences are unneeded for the majority of drug transgressors. In 2002 and 2003, Michigan and New York rescinded mandatory sentences for drug offenders and gave judges the power to impose shorter sentences, probation, or drug treatment.
For decades, Judge Bennett has seen a system that doesn't make sense. He has seen obligatory laws written for the most major, massive drug dealers applied to the men and ladies on the most affordable rungs of the drug trade, and he has actually seen it occur a lot. We when thought of that extreme compulsory sentences would be utilized to handle the leaders of big drug operations. It's time our federal drug laws were fit to individuals that they actually target.
If you have been charged with a drug related offense and need qualified representation, contact us to discuss your case.
Contact:
Mace Yampolsky & Associates
625 S 6th St.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 385-9777